NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Diallo and Ors (No 13) [2024] NSWSC 1088 Hearing dates: 21 August 2024 Date of orders: 26 August 2024 Decision date: 26 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: The evidence of the telephone intercept of 19 January 2022 commencing at 14:02:00 is inadmissible. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – telephone intercept – conversation between 17-year-old accused and his sister – consciousness of guilt – accused musing as to the prospects of being sent to gaol – where accused charged with affray in which another young person was killed – accused subsequently charged with murder – intractable neutrality – evidence excluded Cases Cited: R v Brooks [2017] NSWSC 188 R v Diallo & Ors (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 853 R v Diallo & Ors (No 4) [2024] NSWSC 882 R v Diallo & Ors (No 6) [2024] NSWSC 917 R v Hawkins (No 10) [2020] NSWSC 1931 R v White [1998] 2 SCR 72 Steer v R [2008] NSWCCA 295; (2008) 191 A Crim R 435 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Prosecution) Ibrahima Diallo (Defendant) AG (Defendant) AD (Defendant) Panashe Morgan Ryan Karise (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Balodis (Rex) R Wilson SC (Diallo) M Avenell SC (AG) B Robinson (AD) M Smith (Karise)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate