NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Richard Caine (No 3) [2024] NSWDC 387 Hearing dates: 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27, 28 June 2024; 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24 July 2024; 1 August 2024. Date of orders: 28 August 2024 Decision date: 28 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: McGuire SC DCJ Decision: Multiple verdicts that on the limited evidence available, the accused committed the offences charged. For verdicts see [146]. Catchwords: Crime – special hearing – Judge alone – historical child sex offending – tendency evidence – coincidence evidence. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bauer v R [2018] HCA 40 Christophers v R [2000] WASCA 308 Eades v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2010] NSWCA 241; (2010) 77 NSWLR 17 Ewen v R [2015] NSWCCA 117 Fitzgerald v Kennard (1995) 38 NSWLR 184 Harkin v R (1989) 38 A Crim R 296 Neto v R [2020] NSWCCA 128 Question of Law (No. 1 of 1993) (1993) 59 SASR 214 R v Beserick (1993) 30 NSWLR 510 R v Ian Bruce Lumsden [1997] NSWSC 371 R v Manson (NSWCCA, Gleeson CJ, Clarke JA and Sully J, 60773/91, 60820/91, 17 February 1993, unreported) R v Mueller (2005) 62 NSWLR 476 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 R v Senge (2021) 292 A Crim R 134 Waldron v R [2023] NSWCCA 128 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex Richard Caine (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Crown: Mr J Mehta (Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)) Accused: Mr R Pettit
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate