NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Diallo & Ors (No 15) [2024] NSWSC 1114 Hearing dates: 29-30 August 2024 Date of orders: 30 August 2024 Decision date: 30 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: The tender of an extract of the Macquarie Dictionary to prove a colloquial meaning of the verb "to smoke" is rejected. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – admissibility of portion of Macquarie Dictionary – where evidence of listening device admitted over objection – where one accused threatens "to smoke" the other if he speaks to police – where Prosecutor seeks to rely on dictionary to prove meaning – where trial riddled with idiosyncratic idioms – probative value of evidence wafer-thin – potential for prejudice significant – evidence rejected Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 144, 144(2) Cases Cited: Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd & Anor [2003] NSWSC 1104 R v Diallo & Ors (No 5) [2024] NSWSC 914 R v Diallo & Ors (No 14) [2024] NSWSC 1101 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary (online edition) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Prosecution) Ibrahima Diallo (Defendant) AG (Defendant) AD (Defendant) Panashe Morgan Ryan Karise (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Balodis (Rex) R Wilson SC (Diallo) M Avenell SC (AG) B Robinson (AD) M Smith (Karise)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate