NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pridgeon v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2024] NSWCATAD 261 Hearing dates: 28 May 2024 Date of orders: 03 September 2024 Decision date: 03 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: K Ransome, Principal Member Decision: The application for an extension of time within which to make the application is refused. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – extension of time to lodge application – lack of utility in substantive proceedings Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9 Constantin v Commissioner of Police [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Davis v NSW Minister for Health [2023] NSWCATAP 211 Jackson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22 Kocic v Commissioner of Police (2014) NSWLR 159 Zeitoune v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2024] NSWCATOD 59 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: William Russell Massingham Pridgeon (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Mykkeltvedt (Respondent)
Solicitor: Applicant (Self-represented) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/00144822 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate