NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Manhattan Homes Pty Limited v Burnett [2024] NSWCA 219 Hearing dates: 24 July 2024 Date of orders: 11 September 2024 Decision date: 11 September 2024 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Harrison CJ at CL at [7]; Price AJA at [114] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal in part. (2) Dismiss the cross-appeal. (3) Direct the parties within seven days to file short minutes of order giving effect to these reasons, including orders for the costs of the appeal. Catchwords: ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES – where plaintiff in the court below seriously injured in a fall on a building site – whether plaintiff contributed by his own negligence to his loss and damage or was merely inadvertent when performing work duties – whether plaintiff retained residual earning capacity – whether damages awarded for future economic loss, future domestic assistance and out-of-pocket expenses were manifestly excessive TORTFEASORS – contribution between tortfeasors – whether trial judge erred in assessment of respective liability between occupier of building site and plaintiff's employer CROSS-APPEAL – damages for non-economic loss – whether trial judge erred in assessment of percentage of a most extreme case – whether plaintiff established that gratuitous attendant care services would not have been provided but for his injury Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5R, 15, 16 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), s 5 Statutory Duties (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 (NSW) Cases Cited: Avopiling Limited v Bosevski [2018] NSWCA 146 Burnett v Manhattan Homes Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1431 Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd [1940] A.C. 152 Commissioner for Railways (Qld) v Ruprecht (1979) 142 CLR 563; [1979] HCA Council for the City of Greater Taree v Wells [2010] NSWCA 147 Dell v Dalton (1991) 23 NSWLR 528 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Joslyn v Berryman (2003) 214 CLR 552; [2003] HCA 34 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638; [1990] HCA 20 McLean v Tedman (1984) 155 CLR 306; [1984] HCA 6 Mead v Kerney [2012] NSWCA 215; Kallouf v Middis [2008] NSWCA 61 Metaxoulis v McDonalds Australia Limited [2015] NSWCA 95 Miller v Galderisi [2009] NSWCA 353 Owners - Strata Plan 156 v Gray [2004] NSWCA 304 Rabay v Bristow [2005] NSWCA 199 Sungravure Pty Ltd v Meani (1964) 110 CLR 24; [1964] HCA 16 Waco Kwikform Ltd v Perigo [2014] NSWCA 140 White v Redding (2019) 99 NSWLR 605; [2019] NSWCA 152 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Manhattan Homes Pty Limited (ACN 097 477 417) (Appellant / First Cross-respondent) Gary Burnett (First Respondent / Cross-appellant) The Griswold's Outdoor Xmas Pty Ltd (ACN 106 927 155) (Second Respondent / Second Cross-appellant) Representation: Counsel: J Sexton SC with J Sleight (Appellant / First Cross-respondent) R Sheldon SC with E Welsh and W Lidden (First Respondent / Cross-appellant) I Todd (Second Respondent / Second Cross appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate