NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Cridland [2024] NSWDC 408 Hearing dates: 25 July 2024 Date of orders: 9 August 2024 Decision date: 09 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Tupman DCJ Decision: 1. Offender is convicted. 2. For sequence 1, offender sentenced to a CCO for 3 years. 3. For sequence 2, offender sentenced to a CCO for 18 months. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence – two offences – possess child abuse material – s91H(2) Crimes Act 1900 – maximum penalty 10 years imprisonment – possess bestiality material – s547E(2) Crimes Act 1900 – maximum penalty 3 years imprisonment EAGP SCHEME – delayed 1 year in Local Court – 11 mentions before committal – pleas of guilty inevitable – waste of court resources OFFENCE – NSW Police Child Exploitation Unit – discovered downloads by offender of CAM over 5 days in March 2023 – search warrant – devices seized and examined – CAM found – offender arrested April 2023 – 213 images and videos category 1 – 315 images and videos category 2 – 17 images and videos bestiality material OBJECTIVE SERIOUSNESS – sequence 1 – lower range – not victimless crimes – real children depicted – damage done to children is profound – fuels fantasies of child sexual assault offenders – short period of time – possession in circumstances where CAM embedded in enormous volumes of downloaded electronic material – majority was legal pornography, movies and television shows – offender viewed the material – did not intentionally seek out – sequence 2 – below mid-range – new offence – involved real adults and children engaging in sexual acts with animals – downloaded in similar way SUBJECTIVE FACTORS – aged 39 – no criminal record – intelligent with tertiary qualifications – never had an intimate relationship – lives in state of social isolation – experienced emotional and physical abuse from father – depression and anxiety – receipt of psychiatric and psychological care – severe obesity requiring sleeve gastrectomy – suffered severe back injury – developed dependence on painkiller medication – dulled ability to make proper judgements – financially and emotionally supported by mother since arrest – diagnosed with multiple psychiatric conditions – offending arose in context of offender's social isolation – maladaptive method of coping with conditions – began downloading large amounts of material during COVID – form of digital hoarding – relieved anxiety and form of distraction – apology letter to the Court – indicative of serious mental illnesses SENTENCE – sequence 1 – early plea – 25% discount – expressed real remorse and contrition – good prospects of rehabilitation – medium low risk of reoffending – threshold not crossed – exceptional case – CCO – sequence 2 – threshold not crossed – CCO Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW): ss 79, 91H(2), 547E(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW): ss 5, 67(1)(b) Cases Cited: R v Chesworth [2023] NSWCCA 115 R v De Leeuw [2015] NSWCCA 183 R v Ebejer [2020] NSWDC 473 R v Porte [2015] NSWCCA 174 Minehan v R [2010] NSWCCA 140 Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown) Bede Cridland (Offender) Representation: Counsel: R Steward (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate