NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Del Busso [2024] NSWLC 4 Hearing dates: 13 February 2024 Date of orders: 13 February 2024 Decision date: 13 February 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Donnelly LCM Decision: See orders at [41] Catchwords: SENTENCING – Crimes Act, 156 – larceny of a clerk – defendant responsible for banking duties committed systematic theft of patient funds – Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 5 – whether there are any alternatives to the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment – s 5 threshold is met on the basis of a multitude of sentencing factors – factors include the 10 year maximum penalty for the offence; the objective seriousness of the crime; the additional punishment that must be imposed for the Form 1 offence; the crimes were committed over a number of months and only ceased once the defendant's conduct had been detected; the amount of money involved; the serious breach of trust; the importance of general and personal deterrence, denunciation and accountability; and the degree of planning SENTENCING – jurisdictional limits – requirement of court to determine the sentence by reference to the maximum penalty prescribed and not to have regard to the jurisdictional limit of the Local Court – requirement to apply Park v The Queen (2021) 273 CLR 303 Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abbas v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 FL v R [2020] NSWCCA 114 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 Park v The Queen (2021) 273 CLR 303; [2021] HCA 37 Power v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623 R v Boughen [2012] NSWCCA 17 R v El-Rashid (unrep, 7/4/95, NSWCCA) R v Mungomery [2004] NSWCCA 450 Stanley v DPP (NSW) [2023] HCA 3; (2023) 296 ALJR 107 R v Pantano (1990) 49 A Crim R 328 Totaan v R [2022] NSWCCA 75 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Police (Prosecution)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate