NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rupani v Ku-ring-gai Council [2024] NSWLEC 1569 Hearing dates: Hearing and conciliation conference on 27 August 2024 Date of orders: 17 September 2024 Decision date: 17 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Washington C Decision: The Court orders: (1) The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the agreed sum of $30,000 in full and final settlement of this order and the Court's s 8.15(3) costs order made on 28 May 2024. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA162/23 for the construction of a 90-place childcare centre with basement parking and associated works on Lot 4 DP 1263889 and Lot 1 DP 1263889, known as 113 Junction Road and 160 Eastern Road, Wahroonga, subject to the conditions contained in Annexure A. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – conciliation conference – child care centre – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, ss 7.3 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7, 8.15 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 Education and Care Services National Regulations 2011, regs 107, 108 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2021, s 38 Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015, cll 4.3, 4.4, 5.10, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.5 State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, ss 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.10 Ch 6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, Ch 3, Pt 3.3 Texts Cited: Ku-ring-gai Council Community Participation Plan 2020 Department of Planning Industry and Environment, Child Care Planning Guideline, September 2021 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sumeet Rupani (First Applicant) Honey Rupani (Second Applicant) Ku-ring-gai Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Staunton (First and Second Applicants) A Stafford (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate