NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: 191 Bells Pty Ltd v WJ & HL Crittle Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 221 Hearing dates: 8 August 2024 Date of orders: 16 September 2024 Decision date: 16 September 2024 Before: Ward P at [1]; Payne JA at [185]; Stern JA at [186] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – Misleading conduct under statute – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Whether positive representations made as to contamination on land – Whether there was a reasonable expectation of disclosure – Whether disclosures made amounted to half-truths CONTRACTS – Construction – Whether primary judge erred in construing "as far as possible" in the context of an obligation to assist in due diligence process – Whether vendor under positive obligation to disclose all matters which may be relevant – Appeal dismissed with costs Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, ss 18, 237, 243 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 55 Conveyancing (Sale of Land) Regulation 2017 Cases Cited: 191 Bells Pty Ltd v HJ & HL Crittle Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 297 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Haddad [2015] NSWCA 186 Arnold v Britton [2016] 1 All ER 1; [2015] AC 1619 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Limited (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304; [2009] HCA 25 Codelfa v State Rail Authority (1982) 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 24 Colquhoun v Brooks (1888) 21 QBD 52 Commissioner of Patents v Ono Pharmaceutical Co Ltd (2022) 291 FCR 1 Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 Hall v Fish Board [1957] St R Qd 565 Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 5 Metz Holdings Pty Ltd v Simmac Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 981 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 357; [2010] HCA 31 Wormald v Maradaca Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 289 Texts Cited: NSW EPA Waste Classification Guidelines Category: Principal judgment Parties: 191 Bells Pty Ltd (Appellant) WJ & HL Crittle Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Warren John Crittle (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Fernon SC with L Cooper-Hackman (Appellant) S Robertson SC with B Douglas-Baker (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate