NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mehajer v Director of Public Prosecutions [2024] NSWCCA 172 Hearing dates: 28 August 2024 Date of orders: 28 August 2024 Decision date: 28 August 2024 Before: Fagan J; N Adams J; Faulkner J Decision: Application for Bail Refused Catchwords: CRIME – Bail – Appeal bail – applicant required to establish that special or exceptional circumstances exist – where applicant to be sentenced for unrelated convictions shortly after bail hearing – where it is likely that further custodial sentence will be imposed on applicant – where applicant has not proved that proposed appeals are most likely to succeed – application refused Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW) ss 22, 67(1)(e) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) ss 5F(3), 10(2)(b) Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 r 3.1(3) Cases Cited: Dietrich v R (1992) 177 CLR 292 El-Hilli and Melville v R [2015] NSWCCA 146 HT v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCCA 141 Lelikan v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2016] NSWSC 1467 Mehajer v R [2023] NSWCCA 101 Obeid v R (No.2) [2016] NSWCCA 321 R v Cranston [2020] NSWSC 469 R v Khayat (No 11) [2019] NSWSC 1320 Robinson v R (1991) 65 ALJR 519 Samandi v DPP [2020] NSWCCA 102 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Salim Mehajer (Applicant) (self-represented) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Hogan (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate