NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Geeves; R v Geeves (No. 7) [2024] NSWSC 1168 Hearing dates: 21, 24-27 June; 1-5, 8-12, 15-18, 22, 23, 29-31 July; 1-2, 12 and 14 August 2024 Date of orders: 16 September 2024 Decision date: 16 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: The accused are found not guilty. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – murder – trial by judge alone – circumstantial case – where Amber Haigh disappeared in June 2002 – disappearance less than five months after the birth of her baby – where her body has never been found – whether circumstantial evidence establishes that she is dead, and that the death was caused by the accused – joint criminal enterprise – delay – forensic disadvantage – s 165B Evidence Act warnings – indispensable intermediate facts – circumstantial case Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dawson v R [2024] NSWCCA 98 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Hayward v R (2018) 97 NSWLR 852; [2018] NSWCCA 104 DS v R [2018] NSWCCA 195 R v Stewart (2001) 52 NSWLR 301; [2001] NSWCCA 260 The Queen v Carroll (2002) 213 CLR 635; [2002] HCA 55 TO v R [2017] NSWCCA 12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Crown) Robert Samuel Geeves (Accused) Anne Margaret Geeves (Accused) Representation: Counsel: P.W. Kerr (Crown) P Coady (Robert Samuel Geeves) M.P. King (Anne Margaret Geeves)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate