NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ghosh v Scott Newtown trading as Shaw Gidley (No 10) [2024] NSWSC 1170 Hearing dates: 12 September 2024 Date of orders: 12 September 2024 Decision date: 12 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: Plaintiff's motion dismissed; plaintiff to pay first defendant's costs of motion Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS — Amending, varying and setting aside — Motion to set aside filed before entry of judgment or order — Whether Court failed to consider significant submission — Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 36.16 Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 36.16 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 NSW s 6(3) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) s 48 Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR; [1993] HCA 6 Consolidated Lawyers Limited v Abu-Mahmoud [2016] NSWCA 4 Ghosh v Miller (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 212 Ghosh v Scott Newton trading as Shaw Gidley (No 9) [2024] NSWSC 740 GR v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2023] NSWCA 239 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Ratna Ghosh (Plaintiff) Scott Newton (First Defendant) Rodney Miller (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Neggo (First Defendant)
Solicitors: Stacks Law Firm (First Defendant)
Other: R Ghosh (Plaintiff)(Self-represented) File Number(s): 2022/284281 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate