NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: O'Brien v Supercheap Security Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 1196 Hearing dates: On the papers; written submissions provided 11 September 2024 Date of orders: 20 September 2024 Decision date: 20 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Nixon J Decision: (1) Judgment for the First Plaintiff against the Second Defendant in the sum of $500,000. (2) Judgment for the Second Plaintiff against the Second Defendant in the sum of $100.000. (3) Judgment for the Third Plaintiff against the Second Defendant in the sum of $100,000. (4) Judgment for the Fourth Plaintiff against the Second Defendant in the sum of $175,000. (5) The Second Defendant is to pay the Plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings in the gross sum of $70,000. (6) Pursuant to s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), the Second Defendant pay interest to the First Plaintiff on the amount of $500,000.00 as of 11 September 2024 in the sum of $80,119.62. (7) Pursuant to s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), the Second Defendant pay interest to the Second Plaintiff on the amount of $100,000.00 as of 11 September 2024 in the sum of $16,057.62. (8) Pursuant to s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), the Second Defendant pay interest to the Third Plaintiff on the amount of $100,000.00 as of 11 September 2024 in the sum of $16,046.39. (9) Pursuant to s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), the Second Defendant pay interest to the Fourth Plaintiff on the amount of $175,000.00 as of 11 September 2024 in the sum of $28,258.10. Catchwords: COSTS – application for gross sum cost order pursuant to s 98(4) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – whether appropriate to make a gross sum cost order – where cost and delay of assessment would not be warranted – quantification of the gross sum to be awarded Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 98, 100 Cases Cited: Bechara t/s Bechara and Co v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294 Hamod v State of New South Wales & Anor [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738; [2002] NSWCA 213 O'Connor v O'Connor – [Gross Lump Sum Cost Order] [2022] NSWSC 940 Perera v Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Ltd (No.2) [2018] NSWSC 1577 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Joanne Marjorie O'Brien (First Plaintiff) Kerrin Uytendaal (Second Plaintiff) Mark Uytendaal (Third Plaintiff) Judy Jeanette Fleiter (Fourth Plaintiff) Supercheap Security Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Hassan Mehdi (Self-Represented) (Second Defendant) National Australia Bank Limited (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Kalyk (Plaintiffs) H Mehdi (Self-Represented) (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate