NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mohareb v Manly Local Court [2024] NSWCA 233 Hearing dates: 23 September 2024 Date of orders: 23 September 2024 Decision date: 23 September 2024 Before: Gleeson JA Decision: (1) The applicant's amended notice of motion filed 20 September 2024 is dismissed. (2) The applicant to pay the second respondent's costs of the amended motion. Catchwords: APPEALS — Procedure — Summons seeking leave to appeal — Where President of Court of Appeal directed that application for leave be heard alone not concurrently with argument on the appeal — Where applicant for leave challenged administrative decision of single judge of appeal — Whether listing decision is a judgment or order or direction amenable to challenge or review APPEALS – Procedure – Application to vacate leave only hearing to provide more time to prepare – Unrepresented litigant – Where other party filed response to summons late – Where nothing in other party's response capable of taking applicant by surprise Legislation Cited: Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 7 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 46 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.15, 36.16, 36.17, 42.1, 51.14 Cases Cited: Avery v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages; Avery v State of NSW (Attorney-General's Department) (2010) 79 NSWLR 354; [2010] NSWCA 72 Rajski v Wood (1989) 18 NSWLR 512 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Nader Mohareb (Applicant) Manly Local Court (First respondent) Constable Aden Murphy (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel: S T Munnoch (Solicitor) (First respondent) A G Deards (Solicitor) (Second respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate