NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dai v LAM Family Holdings Pty Ltd [2024] NSWLEC 1593 Hearing dates: 20 August 2024 Date of orders: 26 September 2024 Decision date: 26 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Galwey AC Decision: The Court orders: (1) The application is refused. (2) The exhibits are returned, other than Exhibit A. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) –whether the application was served on the respondent – whether neighbouring trees have caused damage – property maintenance – application refused Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, ss 7, 9, 10 Cases Cited: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wu Long Dai (Applicant) LAM Family Holdings Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: W L Dai (Self-represented) (Applicant) No appearance (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/14702 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
Background 1. COMMISSIONER: Wu Long Dai (the applicant) lives at 36 Oxford Street, Burwood. He has applied to the Court pursuant to s 7 (Pt 2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Trees Act) seeking orders for a neighbouring tree to be removed or pruned. The tree is on the adjoining property belonging to LAM Family Holdings Pty Ltd (the respondent). 2. The hearing took place onsite, allowing the Court to view the tree and both properties. Mr Dai was self-represented. The respondent did not appear. I bring my own arboricultural expertise to this decision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate