NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: GQJ v Commissioner of Police [2024] NSWCATAD 285 Hearing dates: 31 May 2024 Date of orders: 26 September 2024 Decision date: 26 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J D Little, Senior Member Decision: The Respondent's decision to revoke the Applicant firearms licence is set aside and the licence is reinstated subject to the implementation of a special condition which reads: "The licence holder is prohibited from storing firearms and ammunition at any location where (Name: [insert the Applicant's husband's name; DOB: [insert date]) resides or frequents, until the licensee's licence expires or is renewed, whichever is the later". Catchwords: FIREARMS ACT – firearms – revocation of licence – contrary to the public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2006 Cases Cited: Keane v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2008] NSWADT 68 Tannous v Commissioner of Police [2011] NSWADT 116 Category: Principal judgment Parties: GQJ (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Self-represented (Applicant) Maddocks Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/00019458 Publication restriction: 1. The publication of the Applicant's name in these reasons is prohibited. 2. Except pursuant to order below, the contents of all paragraphs in these reasons marked "[Not for publication]" are not to be published or released pursuant to s64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. 3. A copy of these reasons, without redaction, shall be released to the Respondent.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate