NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Baidya v Commissioner of Police [2024] NSWCATAD 286 Hearing dates: 29 July 2024 Date of orders: 26 September 2024 Decision date: 26 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J D Little, Senior Member Decision: The Respondent's decision to revoke the Applicant firearms licence is set aside and the licence is reinstated. Catchwords: FIREARMS ACT – firearms – revocation of licence – contrary to the public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2006 Cases Cited: Children's Guardian v BRL [2016] NSWSC 1206 El-Ashrafi v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 103 FZQ v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2024] NSWCATAD 11 Keane v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2008] NSWADT 68 McDonald v Director General of Social Security (1984) 1 FCR 354 Tannous v Commissioner of Police [2011] NSWADT 116 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Katrick Chandra Baidya (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: M Warren-Gash (Applicant) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/00162752 Publication restriction: None
REASONS FOR DECISION 1. This is an application brought by the Applicant seeking review of decisions under the Firearms Act 1996 (the Act) by a delegate of the Commissioner of Police (the Commissioner). The delegate determined to revoke the Applicant's category H firearm licence. 2. For the reasons that follow, I set aside the decision under review and the Applicant should be reissued with his Category H firearms licence.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate