NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gan v Xie [2024] NSWDC 456 Hearing dates: 23 – 25 September 2024 Date of orders: 27 September 2024 Decision date: 27 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Newlinds SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of AUD$593,155.87, inclusive of interest at Court rates from 1 November 2016 until 27 September 2024. (2) Order the Defendant pay the Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings before me and Gibb DCJ . Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Rehearing after initial hearing and successful appeal – Matter remitted by Court of Appeal – Issues already decided – Issue estoppel – Procedure adopted – Transcript of first proceedings admitted into evidence EVIDENCE – Tendency evidence – Section 97 of Evidence Act CONSUMER LAW – Section 18 of Australian Consumer Law – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Causation – Damages CONSUMER LAW – Section 44(1) and s 44(2) of Australian Consumer Law – Participation in pyramid scheme s 44(1) – Inducing a person to participate s 44(2) – Proper construction of s 44 of Australian Consumer Law – Causation – Damages Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 97(1)(a) Australian Consumer Law (Cth) s 18; s 44(1); s 44(2); s 44(3); s 45; s 236 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 137B Civil Procedure Act (2005) (NSW) s 100 Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (2014) 317 ALR 73; [2014] FCA 634 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd (2021) 394 LR 205; [2021] FCAFC 142 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Dominelli Ford (Hurstville) Pty Ltd v Karmot Auto Spares Pty Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 471 Flogineering Pty Ltd v Blu Logistics SA Pty Ltd (No 3) [2019] FCA 1258 Flogineering Pty Ltd v Blu Logistics SA Pty Ltd (No 4) [2021] FCA 1219 Gan v Xie [2023] NSWCA 163 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2013) 249 CLR 435; [2013] HCA 1 Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 Sherman v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (2003) 47 ACSR 505 Taco Company of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 Travel Compensation Fund v Robert Tambree (t/as R Tambree & Assocs) (2005) 224 CLR 627 Unilever Australia Ltd v Beiersdorf Australia Ltd [2018] FCA 2076 Who Ya Gonna Call Bark Busters Pty Ltd v Brooke [2013] NSWDC 133 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Youxian Gan (Plaintiff) Eileen Xie (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Zhao (Plaintiff) E Xie (Self-represented Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate