NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Keybridge Capital Limited [2024] NSWSC 1215 Hearing dates: 20 September 2024 Date of orders: 20 September 2024 Decision date: 20 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Freezing order made for short period pending further listing. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Interim preservation — Freezing orders — Against third parties — Jurisdiction to make freezing order — Discretion whether to make freezing order — Where evidence led raises risk of continued dissipation of assets without reserving funds to meet judgment — Where plaintiff in derivative proceedings or liquidator has prospective claims against Second Defendant. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Ch 2E, ss 208, 209(2), 1317H - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 25.11, 25.14 Cases Cited: - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler (2002) 41 ACSR 72; [2002] NSWSC 171 - Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380; [1999] HCA 18 - PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd [2015]258 CLR 1; [2015] HCA 36 - Re HPAC Investments Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1638 Category: Consequential orders Parties: WAM Active Limited (Plaintiff) Keybridge Capital Limited (First Defendant) Nicholas Francis John Bolton (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M R Pesman SC/D Krochmalik (Plaintiff) A Gandar (First Defendant) A T Broadfoot/E Doyle-Markwick (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate