NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Diallo & Ors (No 16) [2024] NSWSC 1221 Hearing dates: 19 September 2024 Date of orders: 30 September 2024 Decision date: 30 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) Two charges of contempt, as identified in [22] and particularised in R v Diallo & Ors (No 10); Re referral of witness KL for contempt [2024] NSWSC 1085, are to be dealt with summarily pursuant to Pt 55, Div 2 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW). (2) Expedite the disposition of the matter. (3) Direct my associate to liaise with KL's counsel and solicitors to determine a suitable date. (4) KL's legal representatives to advise the Court of KL's plea within seven days. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – contempt – refusal to answer questions when directed to do so – where court determined provisionally to refer the matter to the Prothonotary for institution of charges – where contemnor submits contemnor should not be prosecuted – contemnor submits alternatively that the alleged contempt should be dealt with summarily – where contemnor to be called in subsequent trial having refused to answer questions in related trial – where Prosecutor also urges contempt to be dealt with summarily due to likely delay in alternative procedure Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), ss 4, 25 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 55, Divs 2-3 Cases Cited: Dowling v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (2018) 99 NSWLR 229; [2018] NSWCA 340 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Dangerfield [2016] NSWCA 277 R v Diallo & Ors (No 7) [2024] NSWSC 978 R v Diallo & Ors (No 10); Re referral of witness KL for contempt [2024] NSWSC 1085 R v Taber and Styman; Re Shannon v Styman [2005] NSWSC 1329 Registrar of the Court of Appeal v Raad (Court of Appeal (NSW), 9 June 1992, unreap) Texts Cited: Justice Natalie Adams and Belinda Baker, 'Sentencing for Contempt of Court' (Conference Paper, National Judicial College of Australia and the Australian National University Sentencing Conference, 29 February 2020) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Prosecution) Ibrahima Diallo (Defendant) AG (Defendant) AD (Defendant) Panashe Morgan Ryan Karise (Defendant) KL (Alleged Contemnor) YA (Interested Party) Representation: Counsel: E Balodis (Rex) R Wilson SC (Diallo) M Avenell SC (AG) B Robinson (AD) M Smith (Karise) M Fernando (KL) W Terracini SC KC & P Kondich (YA)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate