NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Gill [2024] NSWSC 1263 Hearing dates: 24 April 2024, 25 September 2024 Decision date: 11 October 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Lindsay J Decision: Subject to members of the biological family of a deceased person giving to the Court an undertaking that they will, at their expense, cause the body of the deceased to be cremated in a timely manner, order that the family be permitted to have carriage of cremation of the deceased's body and retention of her ashes. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Intestacy – Burial Rights – Nature and purpose of Court's jurisdiction – Determination of competing claims to have carriage of disposal of deceased person's body – Burial versus cremation – Cultural division between biological family of the deceased and a person who claims to have been in a de facto relationship with the deceased CIVIL PROCEDURE — Jurisdiction — Inherent jurisdiction - Nature of "standing" in service of the Court's inherent jurisdiction to determine a dispute about disposal of a dead body Legislation Cited: Coroner's Act 2009 NSW Interpretation Act 1987 NSW Supreme Court Act 1970 NSW Cases Cited: Abraham v Magistrate Stone, Deputy State Coroner [2017] NSWSC 1684 Australian Conservation Foundation v Commonwealth (1980) 146 CLR 493 Britt v Office of the State Coroner [2022] WASCA 75 and 75(s) Brown v Weidig [2023] NSWSC 281 Charafeddine v Magistrate Denes sitting in the Coronial Jurisdiction at Ballina [2015] NSWSC 269 Dayman v Dayman [2024] NSWSC 838 Doodeward v Spence (1908) 6 CLR 406 Ex Parte West (1861) 2 Legge 1475 Frigger v Frigger [2023] WASCA1 03 In the estate of Jones (Deceased); Dodd v Jones (1999) 205 LSJS 105; [1999] SASC 458 Marshall v Elson [2023] SASCA 1, 3 and 4 R v Waters [1912] VLR 372 Re An Alleged Incapable Person (1959) 77 WN (NSW) 156 Re W and L (Parameters of Protected Estate Management Orders) [2014] NSWSC 1106 RAP v AEP [1982] 2 NSWLR 508 Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (Marion's Case) (1992) 175 CLR 218 Small v Phillips (No 3) [2020] NSWCA 24 Smith v Tamworth City Council (1997) 41 NSWLR 680 South Australia v Ken [2021] SASC 10 South Australia v Smith [2014] SASC 64; (2014) 119 SASR 249 Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Limited (2000) 200 CLR 591 W v H [2014] NSWSC 1696 Wellesley v Duke of Beaufort (1827) 2 Russ 1 at 20; 38 ER 236 White v Williams (2019) 99 NSWLR 539 Texts Cited: HS Theobald, The Law Relating to Lunacy (Steven & Sons, London, 1924) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: State of NSW First Defendant: Joanne Gill Second Defendant: Leslie ("Leroy") Speeding Third Defendant: Cathy-May Gill Fourth Defendant: Edward Gill Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Ms Z Heger SC Second Defendant: Mr PG Smart (as amicus curiae on 25 September 2024) First, Third and Fourth Defendants: Mr DJ Reynolds
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate