NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rodgers v State of New South Wales (Department of Communities and Justice) [2024] NSWCATAD 304 Hearing dates: On papers after 10 July 2024 Date of orders: 14 October 2024 Decision date: 14 October 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Hennessy ADCJ, Deputy President Decision: Under s 96 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) leave is refused for the applicant's complaint to be the subject of proceedings. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – discrimination – grounds – disability – whether a complaint alleging a refusal to exercise a statutory function lacks substance HUMAN RIGHTS – Tribunals, commissions and other authorities – Civil and Administrative Tribunal Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Crown Proceedings Act 1988 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales & Ors [2009] NSWSC 143 Singh v Charles [2022] NSWSC 743 State of New South Wales v Whiteoak [2014] NSWCATAP 99 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: William Rodgers (Applicant) State of New South Wales (Department of Communities and Justice)(Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self-represented) DCJ Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/00140435 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate