NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kazas-Rogaris v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2024] NSWCATOD 166 Hearing dates: 16 September 2024 Date of orders: 15 October 2024 Decision date: 15 October 2024 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: A Balla ADCJ, Principal Member D Fairlie, Senior Member Decision: The Decision of the Professional Conduct Committee, as delegate of the Council of the Law Society of New South Wales, on 28 April 2022 is affirmed. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONS — Legal practitioners — Solicitors — Unsatisfactory professional conduct — correct and preferable orders Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW), s 63 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 38(2), 50, 64(1)(a) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) s 126 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) ss 296, 298, 299, 3021(3), 314 Cases Cited: Chief Health Officer, NSW Health v FRC [2023] NSWCATAD 76 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Hammond [2021] NSWCATOD 52 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v EFA [2021] NSWCA 339 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v EFA (No 2) [2021] NSWCATOD 84 Di Giovanni v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2024] NSWCATOD 66 ECR v Public Guardian [2021] NSWCATAD 141 Griffin v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 364 Kostov v Ecclesia Housing Limited (No 3) [2018] NSWCATAP 221 Law Society of New South Wales v Maharaj [2017] NSWCATOD 79 Legal Services Commissioner v Sing [2007] 2 QLPT 4 New South Wales Bar Association v Evatt (1968) 117 CLR 177 Provident Capital Ltd v Anderson (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 705 Quinones v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2023] NSWCATOD 43 Re Becker and Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1977) 32 FLR 469 State of New South Wales (Justice Health) v Dezfouli [2008] NSWADTAP 69 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anne Kazas-Rogaris (Applicant) Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Withana (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate