NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Davis v City of Newcastle [2024] NSWCATAD 307 Hearing dates: 30 August 2024 Date of orders: 16 October 2024 Decision date: 16 October 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Riordan, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - administrative review - government information - scope of access application - whether overriding public interest against disclosure - confidential information – balancing the public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46 Fisher v Goulburn Mulwaree Council [2019] NSWCATAD 34 Flack v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2011] NSWADT 286 Hall v Department of Premier and Cabinet (NSW) [2012] NSWADT 46 Hurst v Wagga Wagga City Council [2011] NSWADT 307 Leech v Sydney Water Corporation [2010] NSWADT 298 McKinnon v Secretary, Department of Treasury [2006] HCA 45 Meldru v Wollondilly Shire Council [2017] NSWCATAD 292 Taylor v Destination NSW [2017] NSWCATAD 272 Transport for NSW v Searle [2018] NSWCATAP 93 Wojciechowska v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 173 YG & GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247YG and GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Principal judgment Parties: Justin Davis (Applicant) City of Newcastle (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self-Represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate