NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sattar v Goodwin [2024] NSWSC 1290 Hearing dates: 1 and 10 October 2024 Date of orders: 15 October 2024 Decision date: 15 October 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Hmelnitsky J Decision: Dismiss the notice of motion filed 27 September 2024 Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Interlocutory applications – Whether plaintiff is entitled to a declaration that the second defendant's wife is not permitted to enter, stay at, or reside at Punchbowl house – Where plaintiff and second defendant were married from 2003 until 2022 – Where plaintiff's late mother had bequeathed Punchbowl house to her under Will Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 59, 66. Cases Cited: Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) v Livingston (1964) 112 CLR 12; [1965] AC 694 Official Receiver in Bankruptcy v Schultz (1990) 170 CLR 306; [1990] HCA 45 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Saqiba Mehar Sattar (Plaintiff)
Tamara Jayne Goodwin, in her capacity as Independent Administrator of the deceased estate of the late Qamar Jahan Sattar (First Defendant) Muhammad Mahmud Alam (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel:
Mr P Bates for the Plaintiff Mr N Bilinsky for the First Defendant Mr D Yazdani for the Second Defendant
Solicitors:
City Lawyers (Plaintiff) Glass Goodwin (First Defendant) Thurlow Fisher Lawyers (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2023/00086003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate