NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O'Rafferty v R [2024] NSWCCA 189 Hearing dates: 23 August 2024 Date of orders: 23 August 2024 Decision date: 16 October 2024 Before: Davies J at [1]; Wright J at [2]; Rigg J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Allow the appeal; (3) Quash the sentence imposed by the District Court on 29 February 2024; (4) Resentence the appellant to a sentence of imprisonment of two years and three months commencing 14 February 2023 and expiring 13 May 2025 with a non-parole period of 18 months expiring 13 August 2024. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – where expert evidence was not put before sentencing judge – whether there was a miscarriage of justice – whether evidence capable of materially affecting the outcome of the sentence proceedings – appeal allowed – resentence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 94, 112(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 5, 66(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(c) Cases Cited: Betts v The Queen (2016) 258 CLR 420; [2016] HCA 25 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 349 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 John Wane Tsiakas v R [2015] NSWCCA 187 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hayden O'Rafferty (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Chhabra / M Wallis (Applicant) J Styles (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate