NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tafra v R [2024] NSWCCA 190 Hearing dates: 16 August 2024 Date of orders: 18 October 2024 Decision date: 18 October 2024 Before: Stern JA at [1] Cavanagh J at [1] Sweeney J at [1] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – Manifest excess – where applicant sentenced for 2 counts of aggravated sexual intercourse without consent, in company – where applicant sentenced on a joint criminal enterprise basis but found to be the instigator and organiser of the assault – whether the fact that the conduct was not motivated by sexual gratification lessens the severity of the offending Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61JA, 61J, 61HA Cases Cited: Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Franklin v R [2013] NSWCCA 122 Haines v R [2012] NSWCCA 238 Imrak v R; Dagdanasar v R [2021] NSWCCA 178 LG v R [2012] NSWCCA 249 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 PN v R [2024] NSWCCA 86 R v MAK [2005] NSWCCA 369 Shalida v R [2024] NSWCCA 55 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lawrence Tafra (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P D Rosser KC (Applicant) J Styles (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate