NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fisher [2024] NSWCCA 191 Hearing dates: 7 August 2024 Date of orders: 25 October 2024 Decision date: 25 October 2024 Before: Price AJA at [1]; Garling J at [3]; Rigg J at [4]. Decision: 1. Allow the appeal; 2. Quash the sentence imposed on the respondent in the District Court on 26 April 2024, and in lieu thereof, sentence the respondent to a term of imprisonment of 15 years with a non-parole period of 11 years and 3 months, commencing on 20 April 2021. The date the respondent is first eligible for release to parole is 19 July 2032. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Crown appeal against sentence — Persistent sexual abuse of a child — Approach to assessment of objective seriousness — Manifest inadequacy — Appeal allowed — Respondent resentenced Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Regulation) Act 2000 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M, 66A, 66C, 66EA, 80AF, 91H Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Criminal Legislation Amendment (Child Sexual Abuse) Act 2018 (NSW) Criminal Legislation Amendment (Child Sexual Abuse) Bill 2018 (NSW) Cases Cited: ARS v R [2011] NSWCCA 266 Burr v R [2020] NSWCCA 282; 285 A Crim R 504 Cheung v R (2001) 209 CLR 1; [2001] HCA 67 DB v R [2024] NSWCCA 18 DC v R [2023] NSWCCA 82 Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 GP (a pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA 180 Green v R; Quinn v R (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Hili v R; Jones v R (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 JG v R [2023] NSWCCA 33 Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Massequoi v R [2024] NSWCCA 125 MK v R [2024] NSWCCA 127 MK v R; RB v R (2023) 112 NSWLR 96; [2023] NSWCCA 180 Nolan v R [2024] NSWCCA 140 R v D [1996] 1 Qd R 363; [1995] QCA 329 (reported sub nom R v Dales (1995) 80 A Crim R 50) R v D (1997) 69 SASR 413; [1997] SASC 6350 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 R v Fitzgerald (2004) 59 NSWLR 493; [2004] NSWCCA 5 R v H (1980) 3 A Crim R 53 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 R v JCW [2000] NSWCCA 209; 112 A Crim R 466 R v Manners [2004] NSWCCA 181 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Pearce [2020] NSWCCA 61 R v RB [2022] NSWCCA 142; 300 A Crim R 1 R v Reiner (1974) 8 SASR 102 R v Sharrouf [2023] NSWCCA 137 RA v R [2024] NSWCCA 149 Siganto v R (1998) 194 CLR 656; [1998] HCA 74 Towse v R [2022] NSWCCA 252 Walker v R [2023] NSWCCA 219 WP v R [2024] NSWCCA 77 Xerri v R [2021] NSWCCA 268; 292 A Crim R 355 Xerri v R [2024] HCA 5; 98 ALJR 461 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Appellant) Ronald Fisher (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Bonnor (Appellant) T Quilter (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate