NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Naidenov as liquidator of Peach & Co Pty Ltd (in liquidation) CAN 161 445 790 v Anderson [2024] NSWDC 488 Hearing dates: 9 October 2024 Date of orders: 9 October 2024 Decision date: 09 October 2024 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Newlinds SC DCJ Decision: (1) The Defendant to pay the second Plaintiff the amount of $362,997.83, pursuant to s 588FF(c) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), inclusive of interest up to 9 October 2024. (2) The Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – Winding up – Claim by liquidator for recovery of unreasonable director-related transactions – Money paid by company to sole director's mother – Defence of loan – Evidence – Proof – Distinction between unreasonable director-related transaction claim and claim for preferences – No need for company to be insolvent – Defences to preference claim not available Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 9; s 588; s 588FC; s 588FDA; s 588FF Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 69 Cases Cited: Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63 at 65; 98 ER 969 Re Bryve Resources Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 647 Re Lesvos Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1288 Woodgate v Fawcett [2008] NSWSC 868 D Pty Ltd (in liq) v Calas [2016] FCA 1409 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steve Naidenov as liquidator of Peach & Co Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Rebecca Anderson (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Notley (Plaintiff) D Allen (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate