NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Styles v Knox [2024] NSWSC 1331 Hearing dates: 19 September 2024 Date of orders: 22 October 2024 Decision date: 22 October 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) Unless the parties approach to be heard within 7 days with short written submissions, Ms Styles is to bear Mr Knox's costs of this application for leave to appeal, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: APPEALS — jurisdiction of appellate court — Supreme Court — whether refusal of a recusal application in the Local Court can be appealed to the Supreme Court — leave required — whether leave to appeal ought be granted — where claim is for small amount — where plaintiff has already had opportunity to raise bias on earlier appeal — leave refused COURTS AND JUDGES — bias — application for recusal — recusal refused — application for leave to appeal from Magistrate's decision not to recuse himself — where Magistrate had decided earlier proceedings between plaintiff and other parties — where plaintiff was unsuccessful in earlier proceedings — whether Magistrate displayed favouritism towards the legal representative of the defendants in earlier proceedings — whether fair-minded observer might reasonably apprehend bias Legislation Cited: Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW), ss 4, 11, 14 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), ss 38, 39, 40, 45, 64 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 10.1 Cases Cited: Cheng v Motor Yacht Sales Australia Pty Ltd t/as the Boutique Boat Company (2022) 108 NSWLR 342; [2022] NSWCA 118 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488; [2000] HCA 48 Lee v Chae-Sang Cha [2008] NSWCA 13 Rose v Tunstall [2018] NSWCA 241 Styles v Rowley [2023] NSWSC 1053 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lynette Styles (Plaintiff) Geoffrey Knox (First Defendant) Local Court of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff (self-represented) First Defendant (self-represented) Submitting appearance (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate