NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Rose [2024] NSWCCA 193 Hearing dates: 21 June 2024 Date of orders: 28 October 2024 Decision date: 28 October 2024 Before: Harrison CJ at CL at [1]; Campbell J at [4]; Sweeney J at [72] Decision: The s 5D Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCING – Crown appeal against inadequacy of sentence – manifest inadequacy – offence of break and enter and commit a serious indictable offence – sentencing judge's discretion to evaluate the objective seriousness – "leniency" associated with an intensive correction order significantly moderated by the respondent's time in custody – imposition of an ICO is nevertheless a custodial sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), ss 5, 11 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3, 7, 21A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 105A, 112 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Cases Cited: Apulu v R [2022] NSWCCA 244 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Cargnello v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2012) 266 FLR 464; [2012] NSWCCA 162 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 FL v R [2020] NSWCCA 114 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Mandranis v R [2021] NSWCCA 97 Manojlovic v R; R v Manojlovic [2020] NSWCCA 315 Parente v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 633; [2017] NSWCCA 284 R v Dugan [2006] NSWCCA 34; 160 A Crim R 135 R v Eaton [2023] NSWCCA 125 R v Eldelbi (2021) 105 NSWLR 133; [2021] NSWCCA 122 R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327; [1999] NSWCCA 435 R v Quinlin [2021] NSWCCA 284; 293 A Crim R 253 Stanley v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2023] HCA 3; 97 ALJR 107 Zheng v R [2023] NSWCCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Crown) Timothy John Rose (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Newton SC (Crown) T Quilter with C Beshara (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate