NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: M1 v R1 [2024] NSWCA 256 Hearing dates: 27 August 2024 Date of orders: 30 October 2024 Decision date: 30 October 2024 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Mitchelmore JA at [5]; Price AJA at [122] Decision: (1) The extension of time to file the summons, which was amended pursuant to leave granted on 4 August 2024, is refused with costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — time limits — extension of time — judicial review — multiple grounds of review — no reviewable error established — no explanation for delay — lack of merit — lack of public interest Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 98, 99 Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), s 8 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 319 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 10A, 12A, 12B Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 136 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth), r 6.36 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 6.1, 6.3(b), 6.6, 13.4, 42.1, 59.10 Cases Cited: Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWCA 39 Beau Timothy John Hartnett trading as Hartnett Lawyers v Anthony Robert Bell as Executor of the Estate of the late Mabel Dawn Deakin-Bell (No 2) (2023) 113 NSWLR 381; [2023] NSWCA 311 Bridges v Pelly [2001] NSWCA 31 Daley v Donaldson [2022] NSWCA 96 Duraisamy v Sydney Trains [2019] NSWCA 269 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Livers v Legal Services Commissioner (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 164 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288; [1983] HCA 17 Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Ming v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2022] NSWCA 209 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541; [2018] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Odtojan v Condon [2023] NSWCA 129 Pirovic v Barbieri [2021] NSWSC 1460 Riva NSW Pty Ltd v Mark A Fraser and Christopher P Clancy t/as Fraser Clancy Lawyers (No 4) [2018] NSWCA 327 Short v Crawley (No 45) [2013] NSWSC 1541 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61; [2007] NSWCA 369 Category: Principal judgment Parties: M1 (Applicant) R1 (First Respondent) Jan Worland (Second Respondent) District Court of NSW (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (Self-represented) K Holcombe (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate