NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barel v Barel [2024] NSWCA 257 Hearing dates: 15 October 2024 Date of orders: 30 October 2024 Decision date: 30 October 2024 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; McHugh JA at [53]; Basten AJA at [54]. Decision: (1) Refuse the extension of time to seek leave to appeal from order (4) made by Russell DCJ on 3 May 2023 and order (1) made by Fitzsimmons DCJ on 21 June 2024. (2) Refuse leave to appeal from the orders made by Fitzsimmons DCJ on 9 August 2024. (3) Summons seeking leave to appeal be dismissed. (4) The first and second applicants to pay the respondent's costs in this Court. Catchwords: APPEALS — Leave to appeal — Where garnisheed amount paid into court after default judgment set aside — Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 124A — Where defendant applied for payment out of funds in court — Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 41.3 — Where some funds released — Where defendant applied to vary order and obtain release of balance of funds in court — UCPR r 36.16 — Where variation application dismissed — Whether Court proceeded on misapprehension of facts or relevant law — Where inordinate delay in seeking leave — Whether prejudice occasioned to the respondent — Where underlying proceedings since been heard and judgment reserved — Whether utility in grant of extension of time or grant of leave to appeal Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 16, 56, 57, 58, 124A District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127(2)(a) Justice Legislation Amendment Act (No 2) 2017 (NSW), Sch 1[5] Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 30 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.15, 36.16(1), 36.16(3A), 41.3, 51.10 Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Barel v Barel [2023] NSWDC 135 Barel v Barel [2023] NSWDC 330 Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Commonwealth v McCormack (1984) 155 CLR 273; [1984] HCA 57 De L v Director-General, NSW Department of Community Services (No 2) (1997) 190 CLR 207; [1997] HCA 14 Elford v Minty [2017] NSWSC 1455 Heydon v NRMA Limited (No 2) (2001) 53 NSWLR 600; [2001] NSWCA 445 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Manhari Recycling Pty Ltd v Compass Global Holdings Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 252 Nanschild v Pratt [2011] NSWCA 85 Power v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 77 Production Spray Painting & Panel Beating Pty Ltd v Newnham (No 2) (1991) 27 NSWLR 659 Proprietors of Strata Plan 5399 v Feehan (1996) 8 BPR 16,211 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 State of New South Wales v Hollingsworth (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 283 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61; [2007] NSWCA 369 Thomson v Golden Destiny Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1929 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) [1985] HCA 28; (1985) 59 ALJR 481 Windsor v Sydney Medical Service Co-operative Limited (No 3) [2010] FCA 364 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Linda Barel (First applicant) Linda Barel as representative of the estate of the late Raphael Barel (Second applicant) Elie Barel (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S A Scott (Applicants) B J S Smith (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate