NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Marahra Holdings Pty Limited v Insurance Australia Limited [2024] NSWSC 1368 Hearing dates: 17 October 2024 Date of orders: 30 October 2024 Decision date: 30 October 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: (1) Leave to amend the statement of claim in terms finally pressed is granted; (2) Insurance Australia have leave to file a further amended defence within 28 days; and (3) Unless the parties approach within 7 days with short written submissions the defendant is to bear the plaintiff's costs, of the motion, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — admissions — admission of facts — withdrawal of admissions and other matters that operate for the benefit of another party — where defendant admitted certain matters pleaded in plaintiff's statement of claim — where plaintiff seeks to amend statement of claim to withdraw some factual matters admitted in defence — construction and application of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 12.6 CIVIL PROCEDURE — pleadings — amendment — application for leave to file an amended statement of claim — where defence admitting pleaded matters has been filed — where plaintiff's legal representation changed — where new solicitor advised earlier pleaded matters not supported by available evidence including as to the cause of a fire — where plaintiff advised it was necessary to pursue a res ipsa loquitur case — whether amendment is purely tactical — whether leave to amend ought be granted — whether proposed amended statement of claim sufficiently pleads plaintiff's case — leave granted Legislation Cited: Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58, 64 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 601AG Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), s 51 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), s 195 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 12.6, 14.4, 14.5, 14.7, 14.8, 14.14, 14.26, 15.1, 17.7 Cases Cited: Ashrafi Persian Trading Co Pty Ltd t/as Roslyn Gardens Motor Inn v Ashrafinia [2001] NSWCA 243 Chandler v Water Corporation [2001] WASC 166 Drabsch v Switzerland General Insurance Co Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), 16 October 1996, unrep) Inglis v English Language Company Australia Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1538 Kelly v Mina [2014] NSWCA 9 Khouri v National Australia Bank Ltd [2007] NSWSC 987 Kirby v Sanderson Motors Pty Ltd (2002) 54 NSWLR 135; [2002] NSWCA 44 Maile v Rafiq [2005] NSWCA 410 Namberry Craft Pty Ltd v Watson [2011] VSC 136 Ritz Hotel Ltd v Charles of the Ritz Ltd (No 20) (1988) 14 NSWLR 124 Schellenberg v Tunnell Holdings Pty Limited (2000) 200 CLR 121; [2000] HCA 18 Sergi v Sergi [2019] NSWSC 865 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marahra Holdings Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Insurance Australia Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Djurdjevic (Plaintiff) R Perla (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate