NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Guevara [2023] NSWDC 655 Hearing dates: 5 October 2023 Date of orders: 5 October 2023 Decision date: 05 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate imprisonment sentence of 11 years with a non-parole period of 7 years 2 months Catchwords: CRIME — Sexual offences — Indecent assault — Circumstances of aggravation CRIME — Child sex offences — Indecent assault >16 — Circumstances of aggravation — Sexual intercourse with child >10 <14 SENTENCING — Aggravating factors — Breach of trust — Multiple victims SENTENCING — Guidelines for sentencing — Role of guidelines — Administration of justice was facilitated by the conduct of the defence SENTENCING — Mitigating factors — Good character — No record of previous convictions SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Sentence after guilty verdicts at trial — Delay — General principles — Moral culpability — Multiple offences — Accumulation, concurrency and totality — Aggregate sentences — Crushing sentence — Objective seriousness — Purposes of sentencing SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure —Instinctive synthesis — Disputed facts — High Risk Offender warning given SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Significant childhood trauma — Experienced war and war related violence —Refugee Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: BT v R [2010] NSWCCA 267 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1 Campbell v R [2014] NSWCCA 102 Christov v R [2009] NSWCCA 168 Corby v R [2010] NSWCCA 146 Decision restricted [2023] NSWCCA 10 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie [2017] NSWCCA 301. GSH v R; R v GSH [2009] NSWCCA 214 LB v R [2019] NSWCCA 151 MAK v R [2006] NSWCCA 381 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen [1998] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clinch (1994) 72 A Crim R 301 R v Doff [2005] NSWCCA 119 R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56 R v Herring (1956) 73 WN (NSW) 203 R v KNL [2005] NSWCCA 260 R v NJK [2011] NSWCCA 151 R v R E [2023] NSWCCA 184 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168; [2004] NSWCCA 13 RJA v R [2008] NSWCCA 13 Ryan v The Queen [20011] HCA 21; (2001) 206 CLR 267 Tepania v R [20018] NSWCCA 247 Weininger v The Queen [2003] HCA 14; (2003) 212 CLR 629 Texts Cited: W Wan, S Poynton and D Weatherburn, "Does Parole Supervision Reduce the Risk of Re-offending?" (2016) 49 Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 497 Category: Sentence Parties: Miguel Enoc Guevara (the offender) Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Representation: Counsel: C Doosey (for the offender) K Ratcliff (for the Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate