NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mannix v Matthews [2024] NSWLEC 1698 Hearing dates: 16 October 2024 Date of orders: 16 October 2024 Decision date: 16 October 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Galwey AC Decision: The Court orders: (1) The respondents names are corrected to Charles Matthews and Carol Matthews. (2) The application is refused. (3) The exhibits are returned other than Exhibit A. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) –Pt 2A application – neighbouring hedge – obstruction of sunlight – whether the obstruction is severe Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, Pt 2A, ss 14A, 14B, 14D, 14E, 14F Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raymond Mannix (First Applicant) Linda Mannix (Second Applicant) Charles Matthews (First Respondent) Carol Matthews (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Mannix (Self-represented) (First Applicant) L Mannix (Self-represented) (Second Applicant) C Matthews (Self-represented) (First Respondent) S Matthews (Agent) (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/285916 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
Background 1. COMMISSIONER: Raymond and Linda Mannix (the applicants) have applied to the Court pursuant to s 14B in Pt 2A of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Trees Act), seeking orders for trees in a neighbouring hedge to be pruned to remedy an obstruction of sunlight. Charles and Carol Matthews (the respondents) dispute that their trees cause a severe sunlight obstruction. 2. The Matthews' surname was spelt incorrectly in the application and on the Court's record. An order is made to correct the spelling of their surname.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate