NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Beck v R [2024] NSWCCA 201 Hearing dates: 14 October 2024 Date of orders: 1 November 2024 Decision date: 01 November 2024 Before: Basten AJA at [1]; Dhanji J at [38]; Faulkner J at [39] Decision: (1) Set aside the sentences imposed in the District Court 15 March 2024. (2) With respect to the State offence (sequence 7), impose a sentence of 15 months' imprisonment, being a fixed term to commence on 16 December 2023 and expire on 15 March 2025. (3) With respect to the federal offences (sequences 2 and 3), (a) impose an aggregate sentence of 22 months, to commence on 15 November 2024, and expire on 14 September 2026, and (b) direct, pursuant to s 20(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1914, that the offender be released on 14 June 2025 upon him giving security in the sum of $1000 without surety, on condition that he be of good behaviour for a period of 15 months until 14 September 2026, and comply with the following further conditions: (i) the offender be subject to the supervision of a probation officer, that is a Community Corrections Officer; (ii) the offender report to the Community Corrections Office at CITY within 7 days of release from custody; (iii) the offender obey all reasonable directions of the Community Corrections Officer; (iv) the offender not travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of the probation officer. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – appeal against sentence –sentences for State and Commonwealth offences – contemporaneous sentences – inconsistent orders – recognizance release order to take effect during State non-parole period – need to adjust structure of sentences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 192E Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 4K, Pt 1B, ss 16E, 19, 19AB, 19AC, 19AJ, 20 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 158 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 47, 53A Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 477.1, 480.4 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 68 Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW), s 14 Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie [2017] NSWCCA 301; 270 A Crim R 556 Director Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Swingler [2017] VSCA 305; 269 A Crim R 526 Kannis v R [2020] NSWCCA 79 Mercanti v The Queen [2011] WASCA 120; 249 FLR 223 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59; [1988] HCA 70 Putland v The Queen (2004) 218 CLR 174; [2004] HCA 8 Rizeq v Western Australia (2017) 262 CLR 1; [2017] HCA 23 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Beck (Applicant) (unrepresented) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K D Ginges (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate