NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shapkin v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 2) [2024] NSWCA 263 Hearing dates: 27 September 2024 Date of orders: 5 November 2024 Decision date: 05 November 2024 Before: McHugh JA at [1]; Basten AJA at [107]; Griffiths AJA at [121] Decision: (1) Summons dismissed. (2) The Applicant is to pay the First Respondent's costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – jurisdictional error – refusal to submit questions of law to the Court of Criminal Appeal under s 5B of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – whether District Court judge considered irrelevant matters – whether identified questions of law arose on the appeal CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – stay – convictions and sentence confirmed on appeal from Local Court to District Court – sentence served – summons seeking judicial review dismissed – whether convictions could be stayed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 195 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5B District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 176 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Clancy v Director of Public Prosecutions [2018] NSWCA 102 Elias v The Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2012] NSWCA 302 Ex parte McGavin; Re Berne (1945) 46 SR(NSW) 58 Forrest v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2020] NSWCA 162 Franklin v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2021] NSWCA 83 Franklin v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2022) 109 NSWLR 198; [2022] NSWCA 58 Gibson v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) (2021) 105 NSWLR 434; [2021] NSWCA 218 Hammond v The Queen (2013) 85 NSWLR 313; [2013] NSWCCA 93 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 390; [2010] HCA 32 Landsman v R (2014) 88 NSWLR 534; [2014] NSWCCA 328 Mack Fleet Pty Ltd v Transport for NSW [2020] NSWCA 149; (2020) 93 MVR 242 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369; [1938] HCA 7 Shapkin v Director of Public Prosecutions [2024] NSWCA 217 Stanley v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2023] HCA 3; (2023) 407 ALR 222 The Australian Gas Light Company v The Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Ward v Williams (1955) 92 CLR 496, 505; [1955] HCA 4 Texts Cited: P Herzfeld and T Prince, Interpretation (2024, 3rd ed, Thomson Reuters) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vladimir Shapkin (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (Unrepresented) J Davidson (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate