NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: H v RJ [2024] NSWSC 1404 Hearing dates: 4 November 2024 Date of orders: 4 November 2024 Decision date: 04 November 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hammerschlag CJ in Eq Decision: Declare that the medical practitioners may administer a blood transfusion to RJ if they are of the opinion that a blood transfusion is necessary Catchwords: PARENS PATRIAE – 16 year old boy has heart condition necessitating urgent treatment – In the unlikely event of a difficulty (with the procedure) where bleeding is involved a blood transfusion might be required – The child's parents and the child oppose blood transfusion on religious grounds – HELD the welfare and best interests of the child require the refusal of consent to be overridden – Obiter observations on the relevance, if any, of s 174 of the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 to the exercise of parens patriae jurisdiction Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: H v AC [2024] NSWSC 40 Hunter New England Local Health District v C [2024] NSWSC 929 X v the Sydney Children's Hospital Network (2013) 85 NSWLR 294 Category: Principal judgment Parties: H (Plaintiff) RJ (First Defendant) The Mother (Second Defendant) The Father (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Kumar (Plaintiff) P Guterres (First Defendant) EJ Engwirda (Second and Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate