NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Drem Pty Limited v LRL (AUST) Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1422 Hearing dates: 24 October 2024 Date of orders: 08 November 2024 Decision date: 08 November 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hmelnitsky J Decision: See [76] Catchwords: CONTRACTS – Construction – Interpretation – Where one party assumed royalty obligations under a historical deed – Where royalty obligations calculated by reference to defendant's proportionate share or interest in mining tenements as varied from time to time Legislation Cited: Mining Act 1978 (WA) Cases Cited: Cherry v Steele-Park (2017) 96 NSWLR 548; [2017] NSWCA 295 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 24 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Yngvar Hansen-Tangen [1976] 1 WLR 989 Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council (2002) 240 CLR 45; [2002] HCA 5 Southgate v Waterford (1990) 21 NSWLR 427 Technomin Australia Pty Ltd v Xstrata Nickel Australasia Operations Pty Ltd (2014) 48 WAR 261; [2014] WASCA 164 Wilkie v Gordon Runoff Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 522; [2005] HCA 17 Zhang v BM Sydney Building Materials Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 166 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Drem Pty Limited (Plaintiff) LRL (AUST) Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J M Ireland KC (Plaintiff) S Free SC/O Jones (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate