NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v Shakil [2024] NSWCATAP 229 Hearing dates: 09 October 2024 Date of orders: 13 November 2024 Decision date: 13 November 2024 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Balla ADCJ, Principal Member S de Jersey, Principal Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) Appeal is dismissed. (3) The appellant's application for costs is dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – residential tenancy agreement – bond claims – decision against weight of evidence – decision not fair or equitable Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 Ryan v BKB Motor Vehicle Repairs Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 39 Unique Commercial Group Pty Ltd v Cusumano [2024] NSWCATAP 204 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hong Nguyen (Appellant) MD Shaidul Islam Shakil (First Respondent) MD Rakibul Hassan Raju (Second Respondent) SM Redwanul Hoque (Third Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self-Represented) First Respondent (Self-Represented) (Mr Shakil on behalf of all respondents) File Number(s): 2024/00266389 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: n/a Date of Decision: 03 July 2024 Before: S Hunt, General Member File Number(s): 2024/00182874
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate