NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: HNOE Limited v Angus & Julia Stone Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 271 Hearing dates: 23 October 2024 Date of orders: 19 November 2024 Decision date: 19 November 2024 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Leeming JA at [118]; Payne JA at [124] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Appeal allowed with costs. (3) Set aside the orders of the primary judge and in lieu thereof, order that: (a) the proceedings be stayed; (b) the plaintiffs be ordered to pay the costs of the notice of motion filed on 15 March 2024. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Summary dismissal – Whether the plaintiffs' claims for breach of statutory duty should not have been summarily dismissed – Where availability of action was a pure question of law involving no questions of fact and admitting of only one correct answer – Whether, in circumstances of particular case, there was utility in determining issue on a summary basis PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW – Stay of proceedings – Exclusive jurisdiction clause – Where jurisdiction clause was elliptical in that its scope or extent was not spelt out – Where not all parties to proceedings bound by clause – Whether stay should still be granted – "Non-parties" and non-parties –Whether strong reasons not to give effect to exclusive jurisdiction clause through a stay of proceedings TORTS – Breach of statutory duty – Entertainment Industry Act 2013 (NSW), s 11 – Whether the legislature intended to create a private cause of action for breach of statutory duty – Where statute provided a range of remedies – No intention to create a private cause of action – Summary dismissal of claims for breach of statutory duty Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Entertainment Industry Act 2013 (NSW), ss 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 39, 43, sch 1 cl 2(8) Industrial Arbitration Act 1912 (NSW), s 521 Industrial Relations (Child Employment) Act 2006 (NSW), s 15(5) Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), s 357(5) Entertainment Industry Regulation 2020 (NSW), reg 4 Entertainment Industry Regulation 2014 (NSW), reg 4 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552; [2000] HCA 41 Akai Pty Ltd v People's Insurance Company Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418; [1996] HCA 39 Anderson v Mackellar County Council (1968) 69 SR (NSW) 444 Askin v Knox [1989] 1 NZLR 248 Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419; [2019] NSWCA 61 Bailey v New South Wales Medical Defence Union Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 399; [1995] HCA 28 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256; [2006] HCA 27 Boensch v Pascoe (No 2) [2017] FCA 146 Brimson v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd (1982) 2 NSWLR 937 Byrne & Frew v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410; [1995] HCA 24 Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee (1999) 200 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 59 CSR Ltd v Cigna Insurance Australia Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 345; [1997] HCA 33 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62; [1949] HCA 1 DRJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights (No 2) (2020) 103 NSWLR 692; [2020] NSWCA 242 FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Ocean Marine Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association (1997) 41 NSWLR 559 FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Ocean Marine Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association (1997) 41 NSWLR 117 Field v Dettman [2013] NSWCA 147 Gardiner v Victoria [1999] 2 VR 461; [1999] VSCA 100 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Global Partners Fund Ltd v Babcock & Brown Ltd (in liq) [2010] NSWCA 196; (2010) 79 ACSR 383 Grand Central Car Park Pty Ltd v Tivoli Freeholders [1969] VR 62 Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd v Rinehart (2017) 257 FCR 442; [2017] FCAFC 170 Henry v Henry (1996) 185 CLR 571; [1996] HCA 51 in de Braekt v Legal Profession Complaints Committee [2016] WASCA 220 Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited v Hannigan [2020] NSWCA 82; (2020) 379 ALR 196 Jackamarra (an Infant) v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516; [1998] HCA 27 Jane Doe v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2018] NSWSC 1996 Josephson v Walker (1914) 18 CLR 691; [1914] HCA 68 Karpik v Carnival plc [2023] HCA 39; (2023) 98 ALJR 45 King v Goussetis (1986) 5 NSWLR 89 Kinzett v McCourt (1999) 46 NSWLR 32; [1999] NSWCA 7 Lepcanfin Pty Ltd v Lepfin Pty Ltd (2020) 102 NSWLR 627; [2020] NSWCA 155 Longreach Family Living (Vic) Pty Ltd v Simonds Homes Melbourne Pty Ltd [2013] VSCA 274 Martin v Western District of Australasian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation Workers' Industrial Union of Australia (Mining Department) (1934) 34 SR (NSW) 593 Nyunt v First Property Holdings Pte Ltd [2022] NSWCA 249; (2022) 408 ALR 277 Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Co Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197; [1988] HCA 32 O'Connor v S P Bray Ltd (1937) 56 CLR 464; [1937] HCA 18 Onus v Alcoa of Australia Ltd (1981) 149 CLR 27; [1981] HCA 50 Pask v Owen [1987] 2 Qd R 421 Polar Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (No 4) (2011) 203 FCR 293; [2011] FCA 1126 Porter v OAMPS Ltd [2005] FCA 232; (2005) 215 ALR 327 Preston v Star City Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 1273 Qantas Airways Ltd v Rohrlach [2021] NSWCA 48; (2021) 304 IR 218 Re Galtari Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] NSWSC 917 Shaw v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 102 Sovar v Henry Lane Pty Ltd (1967) 116 CLR 397; [1967] HCA 31 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 538; [1990] HCA 55 Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272 Willis v Castelein [1993] 3 NZLR 103 Texts Cited: C Sappideen et al, Fleming's The Law of Torts (11th ed, 2024) M Davies et al, Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia (10th ed, 2020) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: HNOE Limited (First Applicant) Manton Music Management Pty Ltd (Second Applicant) Timothy Manton (Third Applicant) Angus & Julia Stone Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Angus John Stone (Second Respondent) Julia Natasha Stone (Third Respondent) A&J Touring Pty Ltd (Fourth Respondent) Angus Stone Pty Ltd (Fifth Respondent) Julia Stone Pty Ltd (Sixth Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate