NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Burton v R [2024] NSWCCA 213 Hearing dates: 23 October 2024 Date of orders: 23 October 2024 Decision date: 22 November 2024 Before: Kirk JA at [1]; Rothman J at [2]; Yehia J at [5] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – interlocutory appeal – decision to refuse a permanent stay – whether the primary judge made interlocutory orders about the availability of defences – difference between indicative rulings and interlocutory orders – criteria for leave to appeal from interlocutory decision in criminal proceedings – whether there was an error of principle and possibility a likelihood of substantial injustice – leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW), ss 43, 105, 105(2) Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), s 7(1)(a) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 192E Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5F, 5F(3), 5F(3)(a) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 130A; Sch 1, Table 1, s 18 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 97 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: ABT v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 AF v R [2015] NSWCCA 35 Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75; [1980] HCA 48 BM v R [2017] NSWCCA 253 Boulos v R [2008] NSWCCA 119 Burton v Babb [2020] NSWCA 331 Burton v Babb [2023] NSWCA 242 Burton v Babb [2023] NSWDC 103 Burton v Director of Public Prosecutions (2022) 110 NSWLR 145; [2022] NSWCA 242 Burton v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2021) 361 FLR 432; [2021] NSWSC 1230 Burton v Local Court of New South Wales [2019] NSWSC 191 Burton v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (2019) 100 NSWLR 734;[2019] NSWCA 245 Burton v Secretary, Department of Communities & Justice (formerly Family and Community Services) [2022] NSWCA 7 Burton v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2020] NSWCA 68 Burton v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2019] NSWCA 21 Burton v The Director of Public Prosecutions [2024] NSWSC 863 Burton v The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] NSWDC 120 DAO v R (2011) 81 NSWLR 568; [2011] NSWCCA 63 Gas and Fuel Corporation v Saunders (1994) 52 FCR 48 GLJ v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Lismore (2023) 97 ALJR 857; [2023] HCA 32 Hammoud v R [2020] NSWCCA 339 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; (1936) HCA 40 Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23; [1989] HCA 46 JD v R [2013] NSWCCA 198 KN v R (2017) 95 NSWLR 767; [2017] NSWCCA 249 Koschier v R (2024) 113 NSWLR 491; [2024] NSWCCA 24 La Rocca v R [2023] NSWCCA 45 Maxwell v Keun [1928] KB 645 Moti v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 456; [2011] HCA 50 O'Haire v Barnes, Chief Regulatory Officer, Natural Resources Access Regulator [2020] NSWCCA 19 Onslow v Inland Revenue Commissioners (1890) 25 QBD 465 Queanbeyan City Council v Environment Protection Authority [2011] NSWCCA 108 R v Chami; R v Sheikh [2002] NSWCCA 136 R v Einfeld (2008) 71 NSWLR 31; [2008] NSWCCA 215 R v Fleming [2007] NSWSC 337 R v Ludeke, ex parte COA (1985) 155 CLR 513 R v Matovski (1989) 15 NSWLR 720 R v Matthews [2018] NSWCCA 7 R v Smith [No 1] [2011] NSWSC 725 R v Van Phu Ho (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 18 July 1994, unrep) R v VPN (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 4 March 1994, unrep) Rosamond v R [2022] NSWCCA 251 Sayer-Jones v R [2024] NSWCCA 73 Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice v Paul Robert Burton [2021] NSWSC 1285 The Will of Gilbert (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378; [1993] HCA 77 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531; [1979] HCA 9 Webb v R (2012) 225 A Crim R 550; [2012] NSWCCA 216 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509; [1992] HCA 34 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 17 March 1987 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Burton (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Burton (Self-represented) G Newton SC with B Queenan (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate