NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jiaqing Xu v Cao & Du Management Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1474 Hearing dates: 15 November 2024 Date of orders: 15 November 2024 Decision date: 15 November 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J (as Duty Judge) Decision: (1) Grant the orders sought in the plaintiff's amended notice of motion except for orders 8 and 9 of annexures A and B. (2) List the matter for hearing on Friday, 29 November 2024 with an estimate of half a day. (3) Case management orders made (see paragraph [22]). Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – urgent interim application for property preservation orders – matter listed for hearing on less than one days' notice – where defendants not opposing making of orders in the short term – dispute as to the form of the orders – where evidence suggests transfer of defendant's assets to his wife or ex-wife – duelling forms of order – unconvincing arguments about non-specific carve outs for sums up to twenty thousand dollars – "something a little bit different" – orders proposed by plaintiff providing greater clarity and certainty – whether orders should be made requiring defendant to disclose assets – not warranted in view of proximity of hearing – order directing defendant to provide information not made Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), Pt 25 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199; [2001] HCA 63 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618; [1968] HCA 1 Cao v ISPT Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 188 ISPT Pty Ltd and AWPF Management No. 2 Pty Ltd v Cao and Zhao [2023] NSWSC 1115 Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612; [1987] HCA 23 Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA [1980] 1 All ER 213 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Jiaqing Xu (plaintiff) Cao & Du Management Pty Ltd (first defendant) Howard Hao Ting Cao (second defendant in the substantive proceedings, not present) Representation: Counsel: M Condon SC and J Hudson (plaintiff) R Alkadamani (first defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate