NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Elith v Ku-ring-gai Council [2024] NSWLEC 1757 Hearing dates: 6 August 2024 Date of orders: 22 November 2024 Decision date: 22 November 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) All exhibits retained. Catchwords: Appeal against refusal of permission for tree removal – Leyland Cypress competing with Turpentine tree – no current indications of negative impacts – negative impacts unlikely in the mid-term future – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Biosecurity Act 2015, Electricity Supply Act 1995 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 39 Roads Act 1993 Rural Fires Act 1997 Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, ss 2.2, 2.6, 2.7, 2.9, 2.11, 2.12, Pts 2.3, 3 Uniform Civil Procedures Rules 2005 Texts Cited: Ku-ring-gai Council, Tree Assessment Guidelines. Ku-ring-gai Council, Urban Forest Policy, 18 February 2020 Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan 2024 NSW Rurual Fire Service, 10/50 Vegetation Clearing Code of Practice for New South Wales, 4 September 2015 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Elith (First Applicant) Lucinda Alder (Second Applicant) Ku-ring-gai Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Elith (Self-represented) (First Applicant) L Alder (Self-represented) (Second Applicant) C Rose (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate