NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pritchard v R [2024] NSWCCA 215 Hearing dates: 4 November 2024 Date of orders: 27 November 2024 Decision date: 27 November 2024 Before: Fagan J at [1] Chen J at [6] Sweeney J at [16] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Application for leave to appeal against sentence — Assault offence in custody by young offender — Previous sentence being served — Failure to provide reasons — Totality — Manifest excess — No point of principle Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115; (2013) 231 A Crim R 413 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 DL v The Queen (2018) 265 CLR 215; [2018] HCA 32 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Ming v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2022) 109 NSWLR 604; [2022] NSWCA 209 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Murray v R [2024] NSWCCA 107 R v Jeremiah [2016] NSWCCA 241 R v Windle [2012] NSWCCA 222 RO v R [2019] NSWCCA 183 Turnbull v R [2019] NSWCCA 97 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Damien Selwyn Graham Pritchard (Applicant) Rex (Crown) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate