NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Boulette v R [2024] NSWCCA 217 Hearing dates: 26 August 2024 Decision date: 29 November 2024 Before: N Adams J at [1]; Ierace J at [2]; Sweeney J at [76] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — Application for leave to appeal — Manifest excess — Whether sentence plainly unjust in all the circumstances of the case Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16A(2); Pt IC Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(c) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 307.1(1) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 DS v R; DM v R (2022) 109 NSWLR 82; [2022] NSWCCA 156 He v Sun (2021) 104 NSWLR 518; [2021] NSWCA 95 Lau v R [2011] VSCA 324 Legault v R [2014] NSWCCA 271 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 R v Aaron Tran; R v Peter Tran; R v Hoang Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 136 R v Agboti [2014] QCA 280 R v Banker [2016] QCA 74 R v Nguyen; R v Pham (2010) 205 A Crim R 106; [2010] NSWCCA 238 R v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550; [2015] HCA 39 Tsen v The Queen [2010] WASCA 21 Yip v R [2017] VSCA 231 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alexine Boulette (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Fernando (Applicant) K Breckweg (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate