NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Insightbox Pty Ltd v Jones Lang LaSalle (NSW) Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1505 Hearing dates: 31 October 2024 (last submissions received 7 November 2024) Date of orders: 28 November 2024 Decision date: 28 November 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Pike J Decision: (1) The statement of claim be dismissed. (2) The plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary dismissal/strike out pursuant to rr 13.4 and 14.28 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – whether proceedings have reasonable prospects of success – whether proceedings frivolous and vexatious – proceedings dismissed Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 13.4 and 14.28 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56(2) Cases Cited: Jones v Sutton (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 203 Maytom v Laundy [2024] NSWSC 817 McDonald v Grech [2012] NSWSC 717 McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 Simmons v Protective Commissioner of NSW [2012] NSWSC 455 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Insightbox Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Jones Lang LaSalle (NSW) Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Transport Asset Holding Entity of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Transport for NSW (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Hall (Defendants)
Solicitors: Plaintiff (self-represented by sole director) Bartier Perry (First Defendant) Thomson Geer (Second and Third Defendant) File Number(s): 2024/00306024 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate