NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Breckenridge [2024] NSWSC 1522 Hearing dates: 27 November 2024 Date of orders: 28 November 2024 Decision date: 28 November 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Pursuant to the terms of s 31 of the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW), on the single count on the indictment, namely murder, a special verdict is entered and the Court orders that the act is proven and the accused, Matthew Robert Breckenridge, is not criminally responsible; (2) Pursuant to ss 33 and 34 of the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act, the accused is to be detained in a correctional facility or at such other place as determined by the Mental Health Review Tribunal, until released by due process of law; (3) Pursuant to s 34 of the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act, the accused is referred to the Mental Health Review Tribunal; (4) The Registrar is to notify the Minister for Health of these orders within seven days hereof; (5) The Registrar is to notify the Mental Health Review Tribunal of the verdict and these orders within seven days hereof; (6) Within seven days hereof, the Registrar is to provide the Mental Health Review Tribunal with a copy of these orders and the Reasons for Judgment, when they are available, and the psychiatric reports of Dr Olav Nielssen of 2 March 2023, 30 July 2024, and 31 October 2024, together with the psychiatric reports of Prof David Greenberg of 2 February 2024, 20 March 2024, 18 September 2024, and 10 November 2024; and (7) The Registrar is to notify Justice Health of the verdict and orders, and provide a copy of the Reasons for Judgment, orders and exhibits in the proceedings to Justice Health within seven days hereof. Catchwords: CRIME – murder – defence of mental illness – accused fit to plead and stand trial – special verdict – act proven but accused not criminally responsible – orders made under ss 31, 33, and 34 of Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW) MENTAL HEALTH – criminal proceedings – where agreement on defence of mental health impairment – special verdict entered Legislation Cited: Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW), ss 28, 31, 33, 34 Texts Cited: American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Crown) Matthew Robert Breckenridge (Accused) Representation: Counsel: J Stanhope (Crown) P Krisenthal (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate