NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tsolis v Health Care Complaints Commission [2024] NSWCA 284 Hearing dates: 22 November 2024 Decision date: 29 November 2024 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Kirk JA at [41]; Stern JA at [42] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal in relation to grounds 1, 3 and 6 of the proposed Notice of Appeal, and refuse leave to appeal in respect of ground 2. 2. Direct Mr Tsolis to file a notice of appeal corresponding with the grant of leave within 7 days, and dispense with the requirement as to service. 3. Appeal dismissed. 4. Mr Tsolis to pay the Commission's costs of the proceedings in this Court. Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES — health care professional — psychologist — complaints referred to NCAT constituted by legally-qualified member, two psychologists and one lay member — "Stage 1" hearing found complaints of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional conduct established — prior to "Stage 2" hearing, one psychologist member advised she was unable to participate further — Deputy President ordered inquiry to continue and determination made by the remaining three members — respondent appealed — whether s 165C of National Law empowered such an order — whether "inquiry" had completed for purposes of s 165C — whether if order not authorised by s 165C findings of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct should be set aside Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), Schedule 5 cl 29 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 21A Health Practitioner Regulation (Adoption of National Law) Act 2009 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law 2009 (NSW), ss 145, 145D, 149, 158, 159, 165B, 165C, 165I, 165L, 165M, Schedule 7 cl 7 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 33 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 45AA, 48 Cases Cited: Anderson v Canaccord Genuity Financial Ltd (2023) 113 NSWLR 151; [2023] NSWCA 294 Callan v Medical Board of Australia [2024] NSWSC 336 Chang v Legal Profession Complaints Committee (No 2) (2020) 56 WAR 263; [2020] WASCA 208 Commonwealth of Australia v Bank of New South Wales (1949) 79 CLR 497; [1950] AC 235 Health Care Complaints Commission v Dowla [2018] NSWCATOD 96 Health Care Complaints Commission v Robinson [2022] NSWCA 164 Health Care Complaints Commission v Tsolis [2022] NSWCATOD 109 Kuligowski v Metro Bus (2004) 220 CLR 363; [2004] HCA 34 Motor Accidents Insurance Board v Motor Accidents Compensation Tribunal [2016] TASFC 6; 78 MVR 135 Mutual Life & Citizens' Assurance Company Ltd v Evatt (1970) 122 CLR 628; [1971] AC 793 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Reimers v Medical Board of Australia [2024] NSWCA 164 Spratt v Perilya Broken Hill Ltd [2016] NSWCA 192 Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd v Page (2021) 106 NSWLR 1; [2021] NSWCA 204 Sydney Trains v Batshon [2021] NSWCA 143 The Administration of the Territory of Papua and New Guinea v Daera Guber (1973) 130 CLR 353; [1973] HCA 59 Tsolis v Health Care Complaints Commission [2023] NSWSC 1599 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sava Tsolis (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M J Jones (Applicant) J Emmett SC and K Bones (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate